vfs: add explanation of I_DIRTY_DATASYNC bit
authorJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:31:32 +0000 (19:31 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:58:06 +0000 (20:58 -0800)
Add explanation of I_DIRTY_DATASYNC bit.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
include/linux/fs.h

index 18cfbf7..98ffb6e 100644 (file)
@@ -1284,8 +1284,10 @@ struct super_operations {
  *
  * I_DIRTY_SYNC                Inode is dirty, but doesn't have to be written on
  *                     fdatasync().  i_atime is the usual cause.
- * I_DIRTY_DATASYNC    Inode is dirty and must be written on fdatasync(), f.e.
- *                     because i_size changed.
+ * I_DIRTY_DATASYNC    Data-related inode changes pending. We keep track of
+ *                     these changes separately from I_DIRTY_SYNC so that we
+ *                     don't have to write inode on fdatasync() when only
+ *                     mtime has changed in it.
  * I_DIRTY_PAGES       Inode has dirty pages.  Inode itself may be clean.
  * I_NEW               get_new_inode() sets i_state to I_LOCK|I_NEW.  Both
  *                     are cleared by unlock_new_inode(), called from iget().