Btrfs: stop refusing the relocation of chunk 0
authorIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:50:44 +0000 (13:50 +0300)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:16:38 +0000 (08:16 -0400)
AFAICT chunk 0 is no longer special, and so it should be restriped just
like every other chunk.  One reason for this change is us refusing the
relocation can lead to filesystems that can only be mounted ro, and
never rw -- see the bugzilla [1] for details.  The other reason is that
device removal code is already doing this: it will happily relocate
chunk 0 is part of shrinking the device.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60594

Reported-by: Xavier Bassery <xavier@bartica.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
fs/btrfs/volumes.c

index f42e412..603cce8 100644 (file)
@@ -2997,10 +2997,6 @@ again:
                if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid)
                        break;
 
-               /* chunk zero is special */
-               if (found_key.offset == 0)
-                       break;
-
                chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);
 
                if (!counting) {
@@ -3036,6 +3032,8 @@ again:
                        spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
                }
 loop:
+               if (found_key.offset == 0)
+                       break;
                key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
        }