mtd: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous

We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correcting
capability is chosen.

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 7e50ed8..0871510 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
                return err_no;
        }
 
-       if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
+       if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
                        sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
                dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");