From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:45:24 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_start_governor()
X-Git-Tag: v4.6-rc1~14^2~2^2~3
X-Git-Url: http://git.cascardo.eti.br/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0a300767e5882ad5b687966c80f9620aa0871be5;p=cascardo%2Flinux.git

cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_start_governor()

Starting a governor in cpufreq always follows the same pattern
involving two calls to cpufreq_governor(), one with the event
argument set to CPUFREQ_GOV_START and one with that argument set to
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS.

Introduce cpufreq_start_governor() that will carry out those two
operations and make all places where governors are started use it.

That slightly modifies the behavior of cpufreq_set_policy() which
now also will go back to the old governor if the second call to
cpufreq_governor() (the one with event equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS)
fails, but that really is how it should work in the first place.

Also cpufreq_resume() will now pring an error message if the
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS call to cpufreq_governor() fails, but that
makes it follow cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and cpufreq_offline()
in that respect.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index f870399f00b1..43f3912a2ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)
 /* internal prototypes */
 static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
 static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 
 /**
  * Two notifier lists: the "policy" list is involved in the
@@ -964,10 +965,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
 
 	if (has_target()) {
-		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
-		if (!ret)
-			ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
-
+		ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
 		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
 	}
@@ -1308,10 +1306,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 	/* Start governor again for active policy */
 	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
 		if (has_target()) {
-			ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
-			if (!ret)
-				ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
-
+			ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
 			if (ret)
 				pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
 		}
@@ -1591,9 +1586,7 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
 				policy);
 		} else {
 			down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-			ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
-			if (!ret)
-				cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+			ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
 			up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 			if (ret)
@@ -1935,6 +1928,14 @@ static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+	return ret ? ret : cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+}
+
 int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -2071,8 +2072,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		return cpufreq_driver->setpolicy(new_policy);
 	}
 
-	if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor)
-		goto out;
+	if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor) {
+		pr_debug("cpufreq: governor limits update\n");
+		return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+	}
 
 	pr_debug("governor switch\n");
 
@@ -2100,10 +2103,11 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	policy->governor = new_policy->governor;
 	ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
 	if (!ret) {
-		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
-		if (!ret)
-			goto out;
-
+		ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
+		if (!ret) {
+			pr_debug("cpufreq: governor change\n");
+			return 0;
+		}
 		cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
 	}
 
@@ -2114,14 +2118,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		if (cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
 			policy->governor = NULL;
 		else
-			cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+			cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
 	}
 
 	return ret;
-
- out:
-	pr_debug("governor: change or update limits\n");
-	return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 }
 
 /**