As reported by Alexey Khoroshilov (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/9/737):
riocm_send_close() is called from rio_cm_shutdown() under
spin_lock_bh(idr_lock), but riocm_send_close() uses a GFP_KERNEL
allocation.
Fix by taking riocm_send_close() outside of spinlock protected code.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unneeded `if (!list_empty())']
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160915175402.10122-1-alexandre.bounine@idt.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@idt.com>
Reported-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
{
struct rio_channel *ch;
unsigned int i;
{
struct rio_channel *ch;
unsigned int i;
+ /*
+ * If there are any channels left in connected state send
+ * close notification to the connection partner.
+ * First build a list of channels that require a closing
+ * notification because function riocm_send_close() should
+ * be called outside of spinlock protected code.
+ */
spin_lock_bh(&idr_lock);
idr_for_each_entry(&ch_idr, ch, i) {
spin_lock_bh(&idr_lock);
idr_for_each_entry(&ch_idr, ch, i) {
- riocm_debug(EXIT, "close ch %d", ch->id);
- if (ch->state == RIO_CM_CONNECTED)
- riocm_send_close(ch);
+ if (ch->state == RIO_CM_CONNECTED) {
+ riocm_debug(EXIT, "close ch %d", ch->id);
+ idr_remove(&ch_idr, ch->id);
+ list_add(&ch->ch_node, &list);
+ }
}
spin_unlock_bh(&idr_lock);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&idr_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(ch, &list, ch_node)
+ riocm_send_close(ch);
+